irishpopla.blogg.se

1. #What happened to my copy of dr cleaner pro for mac how to#
2. #What happened to my copy of dr cleaner pro for mac for mac#
3. #What happened to my copy of dr cleaner pro for mac software#
4. #What happened to my copy of dr cleaner pro for mac free#
5. #What happened to my copy of dr cleaner pro for mac windows#

No, I'm saying AV presents another barrier for any intruders who make it onto your system and attempt to exploit one of those vulnerabilities. For those people I still think a good AV (or at least what I consider good) is the way to go since it offers local protection and is significantly easier to setup than a well secured network.Īre you implying that antivirus snake oils can fix security vulnerabilities?

#What happened to my copy of dr cleaner pro for mac how to#

I was just coming from the other direction myself of a common user since I don't think most end users would understand your network setup let alone know how to implement it. That's perfectly fair and honestly I think you make a good point there. Obviously, I'm using a proper router/firewall, not the POS from my ISP. Personally, I've always found the good practices and good network security to be sufficient (with a Mac). Bit of a performance hit but not really much you can do there. Malwarebytes hasn't found anything that Kaspersky missed, it scores well in lab testing, and it does both signature and behavioral matching.

#What happened to my copy of dr cleaner pro for mac software#

"Good antivirus" is a kind of software that I am increasingly convinced doesn't exist.įor me I've always had good luck with Kaspersky. Because of that I can't always rely on a good network.Īgain, there's that word "good". Cafes, airports, etc., and sometimes mobile hotspotting isn't a viable option but I need internet right then and there. Obviously it's down to individual user behavior but I move around a fair bit myself. That said I also want to point out that it won't really do much if you're not on the network. I'd love to poke around there to see if I can find anything but damn, many companies have worse setups than you. I've never actually used Little Snitch nor have I come across it as an attacker myself so I have zero experience on Little Snitch itself.ĭamn I gotta say I'm really impressed by your security setup. Hah, funny that you bring it up because Snort is the one I used RDP via HTTP tunneling on. That might get past Snort, but Little Snitch works primarily on a per-executable basis. That doesn't mean though that every AV is insecure, that vulnerabilities in AV are just as easily exploitable as your current vulnerabilities, or that AV doesn't have a purpose in conjunction with firewalls and malware removal tools.

#What happened to my copy of dr cleaner pro for mac free#

Yes there's a performance hit and yes some of the shittier ones (esp the free AVs) are in themselves insecure. Like I said, the first two help keep things out while AV helps detect things that slip in. It should be used in conjunction with good practices and good network security. That's where a good antivirus program comes in. That's still a significant time period malware can be actively running on your system before it's removed. once a month) and if they suspect there's active malware on their system. Most people only run Malwarebytes at a fixed time interval (e.g.

Similarly, a virus removal program like Malwarebytes is only useful if you actually use it. Hell I've gotten away with RDP in HTTP traffic. Not an easy thing for firewalls/packet sniffers to identify as malicious. HTTP tunneling for example will still be outbound on :80 or :8080 and the packets will be properly formatted HTTP packets. httptunnel and ssh tunneling are two commonly used techniques I've personally used to successfully bypass both outgoing firewall rules and packet sniffers. You can tunnel your traffic in other protocols. A good AV will help prevent intruders from staying/doing anything on your system if they manage to find a way onto there.Įgress firewalls aren't perfect. Good network security and good browsing practices will help prevent intruders from getting onto your system. Little Snitch (egress firewall) and Malwarebytes (on-demand virus removal tool) are plenty. In practice, the main effect of AV software is to slow your system drastically and to provide additional attack surface. It's much more challenging to string together a viable attack on a Mac, but it's definitely not impossible. This is one of multiple pages for exploits from the past year alone.

#What happened to my copy of dr cleaner pro for mac windows#

For example, check out this clusterfuck of Windows exploits. Your exposure goes up tremendously if you're running an outdated OS (which a decent number of people do due to their dislike of High Sierra).

It's also worth noting that these are just publicly available exploits - there might very well be more/better exploits or even unknown vulnerabilities not publicly disclosed. However, being safer and being entirely safe are two completely different things.įor example, here is a list of publicly available exploits targeting macOS vulnerabilities within the past year.

Macs are generally safer because of their lower market share and because they're not trying to support a decade of legacy software like Windows.

#What happened to my copy of dr cleaner pro for mac for mac#

I don't think antivirus is needed for Mac